Search for: All records

{"Abstract":["Rock magnetic data from IODP Exp. 382 Sites U1537 and U1538 to support Reilly et al. "A geochemical mechanism for >10 m offsets of magnetic reversals inferred from the comparison of two Scotia Sea drill sites"\nExcel Files:\n\nU1537_CubeSummary_Zenodo.xlsx : Summary of NRM, ARM, IRM, and magnetic susceptibility investigations on U1537 cube samples\nU1538_CubeSummary_Zenodo.xlsx : Summary of NRM, ARM, IRM, and magnetic susceptibility investigations on U1538 cube samples\nZip Files:\n\nFORC_Data.zip : First order reversal curve data files in MicroMag format for samples discussed in paper\nDCD_Data.zip : DC Demagnetization curve data files for samples discussed in paper\nHysteresis_Data.zip : Hysteresis Loops for samples discussed in paper\nMPMS_Data.zip : Data collected on Magnetics Property Measurement System 3, including Field Cooled/Zero Field Cooled Curves, Low Temperature Cycling of Room Temperature IRM, and AC Susceptibility\n \nNRM = Natural Remanent Magnetization; ARM = Anhysteretic Remanent Magnetization; IRM = Isothermal Remanent Magnetization"]} 

Paleomagnetic, rock magnetic, or geomagnetic data found in the MagIC data repository from a paper titled: A Geochemical Mechanism for >10 m Apparent Downward Offsets of Magnetic Reversals Inferred From Comparison of Two Scotia Sea Drill Sites 

Abstract We document an apparent downward displacement of the Matuyama‐Brunhes magnetic reversal by ∼20 m at Scotia Sea International Ocean Discovery Program Site U1538 (Pirie Basin) by comparison with the well‐defined paleomagnetic record at nearby Site U1537 (Dove Basin). Detailed stratigraphic correlation between the two sites is possible due to similar lithologic variations. However, the two sites have distinctly different porewater geochemistry. Notably, Site U1538 indicates a greater demand for electron acceptors to oxidize organic carbon and Fe²⁺enrichment below the depth of SO₄²⁻depletion. Magnetic parameters indicate enrichment of an authigenic magnetic mineral with strong remanence properties around the depth of SO₄²⁻depletion (∼46 m at Site U1538) relative to magnetic parameters at correlative depths at Site U1537. Fe²⁺enrichment below the depth of SO₄²⁻depletion is not predicted based on the energetically favorable order of electron acceptors for microbial respiration but is documented here and in other depositional settings. This indicates Fe²⁺production exceeds the production of H₂S by SO₄²⁻reduction, providing a geochemical environment that favors the production and preservation of ferrimagnetic remanence‐bearing iron sulfides over paramagnetic pyrite and, thus, a mechanism for deep chemical remanent magnetization acquisition at depths of tens of meters. The influence of authigenic ferrimagnetic iron sulfides on paleomagnetic signals can be difficult to demonstrate with magnetic properties alone; therefore, this finding has implications for evaluating the fidelity of magnetostratigraphic records with complementary geochemical data. Such situations should be considered in other depositional environments with similar porewater Fe²⁺accumulation below the SO₄²⁻reduction depth.